Economic Aspects of IFM

Floods are a natural phenomenon, with both negative and positive impacts, and, should not be generally considered a hindrance to economic development. Recurrent and extreme floods, however, pose grave risks to development and have negative impacts on lives, livelihoods and economic activity and can occasionally result in disasters.

The possibilities to manage floods are manifold. The concept of IFM calls for a combination of structural and non-structural flood mangement measures which aim at minimizing loss of life from flooding while maximizing the net benefits derived from flood plains. Net benefits are the overall benefit a society derives from using flood plains (such as agricultural output and other economic activities) reduced by the overall cost of using the flood plains (flood damages, cost of flood protection, habitat loss etc.). Which combination of options can provide the maximum positive impact on people’s welfare can be approached through economic analysis. Economic analysis provides a rationale for taking action because it provides some perspectives on the scale of impact and feasibility. The expected benefits of the interventions can be evaluated along with the possible costs, to facilitate discussion in the decision-making process. It is argued here that economic analysis should provide one perspective on the issue, however, it will not provide the single "correct" answer to decision-makers.

Headers and keywords
Page content

                          Next >


Economic Aspects of IFM 

English (pdf)